As this site could be a very important information source, it should have at least an explicitly marked about/contact section, if someone has comments, suggestions, critics to the site itself. I think it's not good to not having this things on such a website. I like the concept of this site very much. Everyone could benefit from. Please think about this issue.

Hi Egon,

I think that's a great idea - I was also wondering whether to start blogging a weekly roundup of the highlights of the site (on my blog rather than here). I sincerely hope that before long there will be too many questions for me to cope. Right now, though, it's very doable.

What do you think - the most challenging question? the Most active? The one most likely to be valuable to new arrivals or those new to the technologies? The one with the least informative answers? One's we'd most like to add to a community wiki? Perhaps the one that has remained unanswered longest?

I've noticed that many of the questions that I've asked have no definitive answer, but are bringing forth lots of new and interesting answers as others join the site. Others could be answered, but are not being answered in great depth (thinking of questions re triple store and reasoner design). I want to keep alive the generally useful questions for as long as possible, but of course there is no (nor should there be) forum-style pinned questions on this site, so I have just been editing the question regularly to keep them near the top.

You know, of course, that you can add a bounty to questions of your own that have remained unanswered for some time. Perhaps, if there are questions you want an answer to urgently, you could offer a reward?

I'm not sure how it will work, since no answer yet qualifies, but perhaps we could open an answer for such a featured question and then immediately make it a community wiki answer so that all can contribute their ideas towards the answer? Perhaps that would be more constructive?